<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Flubs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://odeskinsider.com/blog/more-flubs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://odeskinsider.com/blog/more-flubs/</link>
	<description>Freelancing is more fun with oDesk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 05:09:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monica W</title>
		<link>http://odeskinsider.com/blog/more-flubs/comment-page-1/#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator>Monica W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odeskinsider.com/?p=160#comment-486</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s also 

Allude/Elude 

I got this one (above) from reading a health newsletter where the writer kept &#039;eluding&#039; to things mentioned earlier in the piece - yes, truly...
 
And... 

Affluence/Effluence</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s also </p>
<p>Allude/Elude </p>
<p>I got this one (above) from reading a health newsletter where the writer kept &#8216;eluding&#8217; to things mentioned earlier in the piece &#8211; yes, truly&#8230;</p>
<p>And&#8230; </p>
<p>Affluence/Effluence</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Incurable Disease of Writing &#187; Just Write Blog Carnival July 18, 2008 Edition</title>
		<link>http://odeskinsider.com/blog/more-flubs/comment-page-1/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>Incurable Disease of Writing &#187; Just Write Blog Carnival July 18, 2008 Edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odeskinsider.com/?p=160#comment-349</guid>
		<description>[...] presents More Flubs posted at oDesk Insider, saying, &#8220;Another list of common writing gaffes pros would do well to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] presents More Flubs posted at oDesk Insider, saying, &#8220;Another list of common writing gaffes pros would do well to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelson Manning</title>
		<link>http://odeskinsider.com/blog/more-flubs/comment-page-1/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Nelson Manning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odeskinsider.com/?p=160#comment-338</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a pity I didn&#039;t swoop in when that comment first appeared. In my infinite maturity (as expressed through my high-brow writing here), I would have unleashed such comic gold as saying &quot;pwnt.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a pity I didn&#8217;t swoop in when that comment first appeared. In my infinite maturity (as expressed through my high-brow writing here), I would have unleashed such comic gold as saying &#8220;pwnt.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoreÂ Flubs</title>
		<link>http://odeskinsider.com/blog/more-flubs/comment-page-1/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>MoreÂ Flubs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 07:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odeskinsider.com/?p=160#comment-334</guid>
		<description>[...] MoreÂ Flubs &#8230;one means circumspect or prudent (discreet) and the other means separate from some &#8230; all together/altogether - We were all together on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MoreÂ Flubs &#8230;one means circumspect or prudent (discreet) and the other means separate from some &#8230; all together/altogether &#8211; We were all together on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://odeskinsider.com/blog/more-flubs/comment-page-1/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 03:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odeskinsider.com/?p=160#comment-333</guid>
		<description>PS, and now I can&#039;t edit my post to fix my gaffe, because Michelle&#039;s comment is so tasty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS, and now I can&#8217;t edit my post to fix my gaffe, because Michelle&#8217;s comment is so tasty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://odeskinsider.com/blog/more-flubs/comment-page-1/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 03:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odeskinsider.com/?p=160#comment-332</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the phrase? &quot;I&#039;d rather be lucky than skilled.&quot; 
I&#039;m glad Dave backed me up, but truly, I slipped up and would have used gaffe if I had noticed it. I got lucky and thinking about it, I would use gaff for a hook or spike (like for pulling fish in the boat or for climbing a tree).

It perfectly illustrates the point though. Spell-check doesn&#039;t know what you want to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the phrase? &#8220;I&#8217;d rather be lucky than skilled.&#8221;<br />
I&#8217;m glad Dave backed me up, but truly, I slipped up and would have used gaffe if I had noticed it. I got lucky and thinking about it, I would use gaff for a hook or spike (like for pulling fish in the boat or for climbing a tree).</p>
<p>It perfectly illustrates the point though. Spell-check doesn&#8217;t know what you want to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Robinson</title>
		<link>http://odeskinsider.com/blog/more-flubs/comment-page-1/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 02:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odeskinsider.com/?p=160#comment-331</guid>
		<description>I actually had to look it up to discover that according to the American Heritage Dictionary you can use gaff rather than gaffe.  I was about to jump on you for that one too.

However what I really wanted to mention was another trick for proofreading.  If you write on screen print it out and proof on paper using a different font and size than you wrote it in.  For example if you normally use Times New Roman 12 to write in, print and proof it in Courier New 14 or if your eyes can take it even Arial 14.  Making it look different lets you approach your work with fresh eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually had to look it up to discover that according to the American Heritage Dictionary you can use gaff rather than gaffe.  I was about to jump on you for that one too.</p>
<p>However what I really wanted to mention was another trick for proofreading.  If you write on screen print it out and proof on paper using a different font and size than you wrote it in.  For example if you normally use Times New Roman 12 to write in, print and proof it in Courier New 14 or if your eyes can take it even Arial 14.  Making it look different lets you approach your work with fresh eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://odeskinsider.com/blog/more-flubs/comment-page-1/#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odeskinsider.com/?p=160#comment-330</guid>
		<description>Add another to your list:
gaffes, not gaffs! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Add another to your list:<br />
gaffes, not gaffs! <img src='http://odeskinsider.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

